Compare Qwen3 Coder Plus from Qwen and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Step 3.7 FlashThe code generation model based on Qwen3 has powerful Coding Agent capabilities, excels in tool invocation and environment interaction, and can achieve autonomous programming with outstanding coding abilities while also possessing general capabilities.The model adopts tiered pricing.
step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.
Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.
Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.
Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.
Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.
Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.
Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.
Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Plus: $2.16/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.
Qwen3 Coder Plus accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.
Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.
Related model match-ups readers also look at.