Models

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 vs Step 3.7 Flash

Compare inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 from InclusionAI and Step 3.7 Flash from StepFun on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0StepFunStep 3.7 Flash
inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0
InclusionAI · text → text

Ring-flash-2.0 is a high-performance thinking model deeply optimized based on the Ling-flash-2.0-base. It uses a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with a total of 100 billion parameters, but only activates 6.1 billion parameters per inference. The model employs the original Icepop algorithm to solve the instability issues of large MoE models during reinforcement learning (RL) training, enabling its complex reasoning capabilities to continuously improve over long training cycles. Ring-flash-2.0 has achieved significant breakthroughs on multiple high-difficulty benchmarks, including mathematics competitions, code generation, and logical reasoning. Its performance not only surpasses top dense models under 40 billion parameters but also rivals larger open-source MoE models and closed-source high-performance thinking models. Although the model focuses on complex reasoning, it also performs exceptionally well on creative writing tasks. Furthermore, thanks to its efficient architecture, Ring-flash-2.0 delivers high performance with low-latency inference, significantly reducing deployment costs in high-concurrency scenarios.

Input$0.136 /M
Output$0.544 /M
StepFun logo
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun · text, image, video → text

step-3.7-flash is stepfun's flagship inference model, designed for high-complexity tasks that require deep reasoning and fast execution. It excels at decomposing multi-step problems, performing tool calls, and maintaining consistency across massive datasets. It is the preferred choice for complex workloads such as long-context agents, advanced software engineering, and end-to-end research automation.

Input$0.22 /M
Output$1.32 /M
Cache read$0.044 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0
Step 3.7 Flash
Input /M
$0.136
$0.22
Output /M
$0.544
$1.32
Cache read /M
-
$0.044
Context length
NaN
256,000
Max output
0
0
Time to First Token
-
-
Throughput
-
-
Modalities
text
textimagevideo
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0step-3.7-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0step-3.7-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0
$16.32 /mo
Step 3.7 Flash
$33.00 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0, Step 3.7 Flash?

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0: $0.544/M output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash: $1.32/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 accepts text input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; Step 3.7 Flash accepts text, image and video input.

Can I call inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0 and Step 3.7 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.