Models

Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Compare Claude Opus 4.1 from Anthropic and DeepSeek V4 Flash from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.1DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic · text, image → text

Opus 4.1 is an upgraded version of Claude Opus 4, with improvements mainly in agent tasks, practical coding, and reasoning. Compared to Opus 4, there is a slight improvement in software engineering accuracy; Opus 4.1 has higher accuracy at 74.5%.

Input$15 /M
Output$75 /M
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek · text → text

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is DeepSeek's efficiency-optimized Mixture-of-Experts text model, designed for fast inference and workflows requiring tool use, function calling, and structured outputs. It features 284B total parameters with 13B activated parameters and supports a 1M-token context window with cost-effective pricing.

Input$0.464 /M
Output$0.928 /M
Cache read$0.0039 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude Opus 4.1
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Input /M
$15
$0.464
Output /M
$75
$0.928
Cache read /M
-
$0.0039
Context length
NaN
1,000,000
Max output
0
0
Time to First Token
1.7 s
0.7 s
Throughput
40.6 tok/s
59.0 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
text
Supported Parameters
thinkingtoolsfunction callingstructured outputs
toolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-opus-4-1deepseek-v4-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-opus-4-1deepseek-v4-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-opus-4-1deepseek-v4-flash
140014401480
Overall
14171431
Coding
14521473
Math
14221428
Instruction following
14201434
Longer query
14351445
Chinese
14251467
English
14291439

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

DeepSeek V4 Flash
$41.76 /mo
Claude Opus 4.1
$2,025 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.1, DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash: $0.928/M output tokens; Claude Opus 4.1: $75/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

Claude Opus 4.1: 1473; DeepSeek V4 Flash: 1452 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

Which responds faster?

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 0.7s time to first token measured on AIHubMix; see the live performance charts above for how each model behaves across the day.

Which one generates tokens faster?

DeepSeek V4 Flash at 59.0 tok/s and Claude Opus 4.1 at 40.6 tok/s, measured as output throughput on AIHubMix — a separate metric from time to first token.

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude Opus 4.1 accepts text and image input and supports thinking, tool calling, function calling and structured outputs; DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.