Models

Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

Compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620 from Anthropic and DeepSeek V4 Flash from DeepSeek on key metrics including benchmarks, price, context length, and other model features. Access both models and hundreds of others through the AIHubMix API.

AnthropicClaude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash
Anthropic logo
Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620
Anthropic · text, image → text

Claude 3.5 Sonnet delivers performance superior to Opus and speeds faster than its predecessor, all at the same price point. Its core strengths include: Coding: Autonomously writes, edits, and executes code with advanced reasoning and troubleshooting. Data Science: Augments human expertise by analyzing unstructured data and using multiple tools to generate insights. Visual Processing: Excels at interpreting charts, graphs, and images, accurately transcribing text to derive high-level insights. Agentic Tasks: Exceptional tool use makes it highly effective for complex, multi-step agentic workflows that interact with other systems.

Input$3 /M
Output$15 /M
DeepSeek logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek · text → text

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is DeepSeek's efficiency-optimized Mixture-of-Experts text model, designed for fast inference and workflows requiring tool use, function calling, and structured outputs. It features 284B total parameters with 13B activated parameters and supports a 1M-token context window with cost-effective pricing.

Input$0.464 /M
Output$0.928 /M
Cache read$0.0039 /M

Pricing & Specifications

Prices are per million tokens. Time to First Token and throughput are rolling averages measured on AIHubMix.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Input /M
$3
$0.464
Output /M
$15
$0.928
Cache read /M
-
$0.0039
Context length
NaN
1,000,000
Max output
0
0
Time to First Token
-
0.7 s
Throughput
-
59.0 tok/s
Modalities
textimage
text
Supported Parameters
toolsfunction callingstructured outputs
API Formats
Released
-
-

Promotional prices show the discounted rate; see each model page for promotion windows.

Activity Past 30 Days

Daily traffic served through AIHubMix — how demand for each model is trending.

claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620deepseek-v4-flash

Tokens / day

-

Requests / day

-

Performance Past 3 Days

Measured on real AIHubMix traffic, hourly buckets. Gaps mean no traffic in that hour.

claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620deepseek-v4-flash

Throughput (tok/s)

-

TTFT (s)

-

Uptime (%)

-

LMArena Benchmarks

LMArena ratings by capability (Bradley-Terry, commonly called Elo). Higher is better.

Text
claude-3-5-sonnet-20240620deepseek-v4-flash
1240132014001480
Overall
12811431
Coding
13071452
Math
13031428
Instruction following
12701420
Longer query
12751435
Chinese
12641467
English
12881439

Source: LMArena (arena.ai) leaderboard, imported by AIHubMix. Models without published ratings are omitted per chart.

Cost calculator

Estimate your monthly bill for the same workload on each model.

DeepSeek V4 Flash
$41.76 /mo
Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620
$405 /mo

Monthly = daily × 30. Discounted rates applied where a promotion is active.

FAQ

Which is cheaper: Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620, DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash: $0.928/M output tokens; Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620: $15/M. Use the cost calculator above to estimate your own workload.

How do their coding arena scores compare?

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 1452; Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620: 1307 (LMArena coding leaderboard).

What inputs and capabilities does each model support?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620 accepts text and image input; DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts text input and supports tool calling, function calling and structured outputs.

Can I call Claude 3.5 Sonnet 20240620 and DeepSeek V4 Flash with the same API key?

Yes. AIHubMix serves every model on this page behind one OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so switching between them is a one-line change to the model field — no second account, key or SDK.

Popular comparisons

Related model match-ups readers also look at.